[ID: two pencil sketches. in the first Hanazawa Teruki is leaning forward with his hands on his hips, smiling confidently and saying, "My love. I mean my rival*." the second is of Kageyama Shigeo drawn as a trans girl. she smiles as she brushes some of her hair away from her face. her hair is in pigtail braids and she's wearing a short sleeved dress with an avocado on it. she also has bracelets, a necklace, and a scarf as a belt. /end ID]
teru klavier pose + girl mob. you agree
Male Reader x 141 Boys
Male reader is introduced to the 141 but is younger than them and has the rank of a General...
pairing: professional/platonic!141 x m!reader
warnings: swearing
note: i chose to do this as hcs as opposed to an actual fic bc I couldn't actually think of a plot or anything
it's E Squadron of the SAS who bring you over to the one four one base; you used to be one of them, and they've never been prouder and they do kind of want to show off that one of their own had climbed so far up the ladder at such a young age
Price is the first to meet you, a little shocked that someone so young is so far up the food chain; but he's polite, and he doesn't act as if you're any different just because you're young. he also doesn't treat you any differently because of your rank, either; but if anyone gets gobby or tries to be mean to you based on your age, he'll stand up for you
Ghost is the same, although he's not as polite; he's still nice, still offers to show you around and everything. he doesn't really care that you're young, especially for a general - sure he's a bit shocked at first but he soon shrugs it off, it's not really a big deal; he might wonder how you got so high up the chain of command so young, but he won't ask
Soap, however, does ask. at length. he doesn't make it a secret that he's impressed, or that he's curious; he tries his best to be on his best behaviour, but he's not going to hold back any questions that he's got at all. but if you ask him to back off, he will - if he's asking a lot of personal questions (which he will), and you ask him to be a bit more distant, he'll crack a joke to show there's no ill will and he'll try to calm it down a notch, try being the key word
Gaz is a mix, he might ask you how you achieved the rank of general at your age, but only if he can get you alone for a couple of minutes; he doesn't want to pry, although he will make it known that it's kind of really impressive and cool that someone so young managed to get that high up - he'll joke around with you more, though, as it's nice to have someone around who would understand certain things like Lizzy the daily star lettuce and Rishi Sunak sounding like Will from The Inbetweeners (briefcase wanker)
they do try their best to make you feel welcome, though, and to make you feel like one of them - you might be a general, but because of your previous experience as SAS, especially as E Squadron, they're more trusting of you. besides, you're young, and you seem like you've got a good head on your shoulders anyway
whenever you're out of the room, though, it'll Price who speaks up
"that (y/n), he's a nice lad, ain't he?"
to which Ghost will nod
Soap will pipe up with a "yeah, he seems alright, actually"
Gaz will nod in agreement. "you sure we can't ask to be under his command?"
Hostages tortured to death. Parents executed in front of their children. Doctors beaten. Babies murdered. Sexual assault weaponised. No, not Hamas crimes. This is part of an ever-growing list of documented atrocities committed by Israel in the five months since 7 October – quite separate from the carpet bombing of 2.3 million Palestinians in Gaza and a famine induced by Israel’s obstruction of aid. And yet while the western establishment media has been chock full of the most lurid allegations of savagery directed against Hamas, sometimes with little or no supporting evidence, Israeli atrocities are excused or quickly forgotten. Accusations against Hamas are endlessly reheated to paint a picture of a supremely dangerous and bestial militant group, in turn rationalising the slaughter and starvation of Gaza’s population to “eradicate” it as a terrorist organisation. But equally barbarous atrocities committed by Israel – not in the heat of battle, but in cold blood – are treated as unfortunate, isolated incidents that cannot be connected, that paint no picture, that reveal nothing of import about the military that carried them out. If Hamas’ crimes were so savage and sadistic they still need to be reported months after they took place, why does the establishment media never feel the need to express equal horror and indignation at equivalent or worse acts of cruelty and sadism being inflicted by Israel on Gaza – not five months ago, but right now? Israel's torture of doctors, its sexual assaults of Palestinian women, it's leaving premature babies to die after its forces stormed a hospital. Where is the outrage? This is part of a pattern of behaviour by the western media that leads to only one possible deduction: Israel’s five-month-long attack on Gaza is not being reported. Rather, it is being selectively narrated – and for the most obscene of purposes. Through consistent and glaring failures in their coverage, establishment media – including supposedly liberal outlets, from the BBC and CNN to the Guardian and New York Times – have smoothed the way for Israel to carry out mass slaughter in Gaza, what the World Court has assessed as plausibly a genocide. The role of the media has not been to keep us, their audiences, informed about one of the greatest crimes in living memory. It has been to buy time for US President Joe Biden to keep arming his most useful of client states in the oil-rich Middle East, and to do so without damaging his prospects for re-election in November’s US presidential vote. If Russian President Vladimir Putin was a madman and a barbarous war criminal for invading Ukraine, as every western media outlet agrees, what does that make Israeli officials, when every one of them supports far worse atrocities in Gaza, directed overwhelmingly at civilians? And more to the point, what does that make Biden and the US political class for materially backing Israel to the hilt: sending bombs, vetoing demands for a ceasefire at the United Nations, and freezing desperately needed aid? Worrying about the optics, the president expresses his discomfort, but he carries on helping Israel regardless. While western politicians and commentators worry about some imaginary existential threat those brief events of five months ago pose to the nuclear-armed state of Israel, Israel is quite literally wiping Gaza off the map day by day, quite undisturbed.
Me when posts tagged "male character x female reader" find their way into "x male reader" tags
some of you just cannot accept that “i just don’t like it” is a complete reason to not engage with media or a facet of media